What is an Inertial System?
Inertial systems are a skillful summary of objects, which
the detections of the functions of the world for the intellect of man.
It divides the very much of events of nature in individual divisible
areas. Inertial systems with all its components can be regarded and
treated as single compact bodies, what is the purpose of their
invention. What happens in them, the inertial system is the reference.
The reference for relations with the environment is the absolute fixed
point of the world.
systems are tiny particles such as muons over interconnected
parts (spaceship) and unconnected only equal moving objects up to the
entirety of the earth's surface. The latter, however, with one
exception: only in the horizontal plane. Why? That will answer the
following "heart of the matter"
of inertial systems.
In teaching inertial systems are defined as moving systems with
constant speed, ie unaccelerated. Within an inertial system, it would
be impossible to detect whether it is moving or not. But, constant
speed and the impossibility to detect motions are given
also in vehicles on earth as car, train, plane and also on the existing
movement of the earth's surface by itself. Therefore also they are,
contrary to the teaching dogma, inertial systems. Billiards for example
can play only in an unaccelerated system, an inertial system. This is
given in the horizontal direction at the earth's surface. A "billiard
in a three
dimensional room" is, of course, on the earth not possible, only in a
not accelerating spaceship.
Which relations have inertial systems to the absolute zero point? Speed
respect to the zero point leads to
their definition. How can detected there speed? With the time dilation
(see in the
next chaptor), which owns inertial systems. Time dilation arises
only by Newtonian movements and Newtonian movements are always
movements against the zero point of the world.
What is, if an inertial system has no movement against the zero point?
Then it is a so called "outstanding" system, a particlularly system.
dogma there would not exist such an "outstanding" system. What is "special"
on it? It is characterized by that, that the time in it runs with the
highest possible speed of these world, it has no time dilation. A
second "outstanding" inertial system is that, what is
moving with light
speed, the time in it stands still
The result is a new basic definition of inertial systems with its
true "heart of the matter":
Inertial systems are "isles of time"
the nature by all her single objects is impossible.
Every interacting things in
this cosmos happens in inertial systems. Depending on their Newtonian
movements to absolute zero the time in inertial systems goes slower,
caused by the time dilation. On earth the time dilation is the same for
all objects. Smallest existing differences of gravitation in it are
ignored, just as smallest differences of the objects in
inertial systems by there motions against the system, otherwise an
inertial system makes no sense. Ultimately, of course, each single
object is an inertial system for itself. But by this the name sytem
would be nonsensical. However, since a muon also is subject to the time
dilation, it must be assumed that in its occur internal time-operations
and so it is an inertial system. Its course of time can be recognized
radioactivity. Whether particles, that have no course of time, can also
be an inertial system, is unclear.
Inside inertial systems all operations runs by Newtonian physics.
Namely with the time, which is running in the inertial system, arose by
its movement by the time dilation. This
implies that Newtonian physics is relativistic. Relativistic
is, that natural events occur with different timings. But, an other physics than
the Newtonian does not exist in this cosmos. The laws of
physics applies unchanged in inertial sytems! That means absolutely: in
it needs no correction caused by the time dilation, for all what
Corrections with the relativistic factor are required only when seen
one inertial system into an other. Corrected must the view of
the observer and not the seen in the observed system. If, for example,
a very large fast spaceship a car drives against a wall, an observer
sees from its location as if it runs in slow motion. But the resulting
damages on the car did not fit to
the seemingly too slow speed, how the observer is measuring with his
faster running clock. However
the speedometer in the car in the spaceship reveals
indeed the very high speed that exactly arise the observed devastations. The clock
of the observer is running too fast for what is happening in the space
must be adapted with the relativistic factor from the space ship.
Observations from the zero point in moving inertial systems always
slower sequences of events in them (slow motion). Observations from
moving inertial systems in stationary or slower moving shows in
faster events in them (time-lapse).
Besides the outstanding inertial systems arised by the limit
conditions in relation to the absolute reference point of the world,
which are the one at rest and the other one at maximum possible speed,
there is a "special" inertial system, which is characterized by the
fact that we live in it. For us it is the one that determines our live
and our technology.
How is to find out which motion the own inertial system has? The own
clock does not say. A local clock without time dilation can not be in
an inertial system. A look to a clock in rest is influenced by
the own time dilation. There is only one way, to measure an
object whose velocity is known. And there is only one, the
velocity of light. A measurement of the velocity of light led to the
the own clock.
For all externals, which we observed from this
earth's inertial or coordinate system, we used it as a zero point. An
early observation from this "zero point" was the wrong circulating of
heaven about us. It was recognized with most difficult birth pangs
after millennia. But the idea that there still could arise further
errors does not even arise for centuries. Only after this centuries
Einstein came up to a new point of reference, a force-free body on its
geodesic. But, that his reference point is not free of movements,
he did not realize. Surely this was his biggest mistake. Thus he found
not the both special inertial systems determined by the movement
How is to handle the inertia system earth's surface?
It has a constant Newton's basic speed, the escape velocity of the
earth. Accordingly to it is its time dilation. For everything that
happens in it, it provides the zero point. Movements against it
therefore are also referred as absolute. (For the "absolute" of the
entire cosmos the language has no additional term, it was not known.)
difference compared to a "normal" inertial system with only evenly
motion, however, is, that an acceleration exists in the vertical
direction. It is one with which it will be accelerated continuously and
constantly upward. It is the same, as if this system were in Einsteinīs
space steadily accelerating elevator. Therefore in it the laws for
inertial systems apply only in the horizontal direction. For all
vertical parts of movements must be considered, that they are
influences by acceleration. Nevertheless humans intellect was found a
clear view, he can think separately in horizontal and vertical
direction. The formation of the physics succeeded here on earth, so,
how it is valid in all inertial systems without any accelerations in
But, what man does not creates up today, is to distinguish
relatively from absolute, ie fictitious from true. Bike- and
car-drivers and airplane pilots can see the air coming against her and
they believe that is true. But, just as the term "absolute" in its
highest meaning is related to the fixed point of the whole world, must
it at lack of other expressions, how is written before to the fixed
point "inertial system", now even deeper on yet another, also relate to
single natural event. From the participating objects must be found the
one, to which relate a cause-effect principle of only a single nature
For this problem as example the nature event flying. By it only two
objects are involved,
the flying object and the air. Because a flying object without support
falls down, it must do something to prevent it. Therefore it needs
with which it can nourish a cause-effect-process that holds it up. For
this function can be either the flying object or the air the reference.
Because flying is a moving event, the reference point for its movements
must be found. Movements against this "point to find" are absolutely.
To find the reference point of a single event, the rule is, that the
object, that brings in the energy, is the moving object. This object is
"doing something", is active. The other object only reacts, is passive.
The passive object is always the object of reference of a natural
events, no matter whether it is
moving against the earth's surface or not!
It hosts the most important question: what happens with it? And that
has to be observed on it from its state before. Chop the wood, for
example, the wood is the passive object. The ax is the active, it has
the energy in its movement, with which it splits the wood. The ax is
moving through the wood and not the wood along the ax. As accurately
not the air flows past a plane, but the aircraft through the air. An
airplane has the absolute motion.
For flying, the air is therefore the reference point, it
is the passive object. The flying object is the active, it has the
powered movement that brings the air to a reaction, so that arise a
the air. So, not the air moves past a flying object, but rather a
object moves against the air, it has the absolute
movement for this
natural event. From the perspective of a pilot, air flows past him, but
only relatively, fictitious, untrue. The copy of flying with the wind
tunnel with its exchange of cause and effect supports the relative view
that the air passing a flying object would be a true flow. The
crucial question for flying is: what happens with the air? The
answer lays only in the observation of the air with the view from its
state before, so, as if no plane or bird or bumble bee would come to
the observed location. This represents, that man has infinite
difficulties in the nature to distinguish absolutly from relative, ie right from wrong.
The insights into the world must be divided into absolute absolutely, these are
the ones in relation to the fixed point of the world, in absolutely in relation to
inertial systems, valid for the inner of inertial systems, and in relatively out of movements
towards inertial systems or the fixed point of the world. Never a correct theory can be found
from a relative perspective.