What is Gravitation?
First published in 2005 in Germany in "Innovative Physik"
The following animation shows which lane an arrow takes, which is shot
sideways into a falling water wall.
What is special about it?
It shows, how the arrow takes on the same trajectory as if it were shot
in the air. But to the line in the water wall one would say, that the
arrow would go down by the falling water wall. On the other hand, in
the air one says that the force of attraction deflects the arrow
What does the position of the arrow indicate? In the water wall it
retains its initial direction. In the air, however, it would take the
direction of the trajectory, since the arrow is always directed in the
direction of movement.
if the arrow were to be shot from the surface of the moon in the same
way, it would maintain its upward direction as in the wall of water.
What conclusions can be drawn from these facts?
The arrow basically follows Newton's laws of inertia. It is moving
forward, caused by a pulse with constant speed and direction
In the falling water wall arises the well known ballistic by adding
with the movement of the falling water wall. Based on the falling
water, ie into
water, the arrow still moves straight ahead. If one falls with the
water in the water one can see, how the arrow flitting past
one in a straight line.
In the coordinate system of the water the arrow moves straight ahead
and with constant speed,
in the coordinate system of the earth's surface, the arrow moves on a
ballistic line, a so-called geodesic.
as the arrow is dragged down by the wall of water with its straight
Newtonian motion in it, it is even taken down on the moon by a something, what is
equally falling, an invisible "something". The water wall only visibly makes
it clear, that a falling "something" is leading the arrow to its
ballistic orbit, even though it follows Newton's laws of inertia.
existence of an attraction force has already been ruled out by Newton
himself, and even today, after nearly three hundred years, it has still
not been proven. The attraction force theory is an
only logical and
credible explanation for the phenomenon of that, that bodies accelerate
downwards. But: it looks only like a force, that is acting
Between appearance and being, however, there are sometimes worlds, as
here too. Only mathematically calculations come with the fictional
attraction to the right results. But not only by this theory, but three
others, what can not be. Mathematical results are no proof for physical
theories must be able to answer questions and not
provide arithmetic values. Already Richard Feynman (Nobel Prize
1965) stated, that mathematics is not physics. A gravitational theory
must for example answer the question, why the gravitational effect
decreases quadratically to the distance. If it
can not do that, is it alone by that reason completely mistaken.
The previous only knowledge, that this is so, is still no confirmation,
so real knowledge, why that is so. The attraction theory as well as the
theory of general relativity as a theory of gravitation can not answer
this, so they are not correct.
The second example of the gravitational effect is a jumper in a
In the following animation he jumps from a springboard. The blue line
shows the direction of the Newtonian line of inertia, in which the
jumper would move away from the Earth's surface if there were no
Gravitation is an invisible something, that falls down and carries body
with it like the animation of the falling water wall shows. This
"something" also takes the jumper down with its Newtonian
inertial line, now
marked red. The red vector arrow at the springer's center
of gravity is its constant velocity on the inertial line.
In the water wall, the process is obvious, but in the air or on the
moon in a vacuum? The latter, the vacuum, is the content-laden keyword.
It is absolutely certain, even from Einstein, that there is no vacuum.
There is something in the empty room! But this is not material in the
sense that it has an inertia. It is sometimes referred to as energy.
But energy has the meaning of an equivalence between energy and
mass. And that is why there exist an interaction between ether and
bodies, namely the entrainment of the bodies during movements of the
The guesswork of the invisible, but effective
vacuum dissolves itself,
if the ether will be accepted, that Einstein banished from physics.
The Hafele-Keating experiment proves, that the ether really exists.
But Einstein can not comment this, because he died before this
experiment. So he can not more correcting his mistake. After him no one
dares to shake his doctrines anymore, a believing science without
The existence of the ether is also proved by some other measurements, even by the Michelson-Morley experiment. The ether is an unknown substance (possibly it also
consists Higgs particles) without inertia, invisible but effective
and filling the whole space of the universe up to the rooms beetween
electrons and nucleus of atoms! Ether is the expanding "cloud", the
foundation of our universe. It is also spoken from a "Dirac
Lake", which is a good comparison for the ether.
The electrons of atoms must also move
opposite to it, just as the whole atom with its movements and we
too with our movements. The falling water wall is also carried along by
the ether falling into the earth like the arrow in it. Why the ether
flows into celestrial bodies, so masses, still needs to be explored.
The whole process of jumping from the springboard
can be described as
follows: the jumper follows Newtonian physics just like the falling
ether as the basis of the Newtonian physics.
The zero point of
the world is the ether! And this "fixed point" unfortunately moves into
celestial bodies. This puts us in a position, where we are
trigonometrically, except for the earth's rotation and the course of
the earth around the sun, to the starry sky at rest, but for the
observation of the gravitational effect in a completely inappropriate
place. We observe the falling of other bodies from a state of
acceleration upward. so not only from a movement, but even from an
Einstein placed the observation point as a fix point by a falling body,
one is free of accelerations, that means free of forces and developed
out of this his general theory of relativity. Unfortunately he did a
lapse: he forgot, that a reference body must not only be free of
acceleration, but also free of any other motions!
The fall curve visible from the earth's surface is fictitious. It is as
fictitious as the observation, that the sun revolves around the earth.
The Earth's surface is far away from being able to detect absolute
movements of objects in the cosmos, that means to be a reference point
for physical processes. Technically, however, the earth's surface can
be taken as a reference point, because it only calculates with
incremental difference values and non absolute values.
The absolute way of the the jumper travels is that against the ether,
made visible by the red line. So although the path of the jumper is the
parabola from Earth's point of view, in reality it only covers the
straight path on the red line. This distance is therefore the shortest
possible between jump and dive into the water. From this, pragmatically
mathematical (that means without a physical bottom of the pants) was
created the so-called minimal-motion-theory for gravitation according to Hamilton's
principle. Their results are correct, but without the
knowledge of why.
The ether is the zero point of the world! Movements towards it are all,
that happens in the cosmos by Newtonian physics. And there is no other
physics! Gravitational processes, that is falling on celestial bodies,
are movements of the ether, that is the fixed point of the world and therefore also for the Newtonian physics.
However, this requires a new way of thinking. The earth soaks up ether
like a vacuum cleaner, which leads to the gravitational time dilation
and the non-existent airstream of the ether on its orbit around the
sun. The ether does not make the rotation of the earth except for a
tiny bit after the Lense-Thirring effect.